Eternal Desire
Your Pages Recently Viewed
Your Content Recently Viewed

Arkie2 Comments

  • 0

Nice enough looking woman Arkisi but something went wrong with the file upload - all the shots throughout the set are far too yellow in overall color cast.

  • 1

Yeah... butt only one of your favorite shots in the whole set.

  • 2

Uh... er... 'scuse me miss... can I give you a hand and hold those for you?

Simple set and lighting for a _very_ complex woman. Nicely done to you Mila... and you too Arkisi. (Of course, with Mila, this could have been done with a Kodak Instamatic and a box of flash cubes. Hard to take a bad photo of her.) ;-)

  • 2

Outstanding set of images (how could it be otherwise with Serena?) shot in great light. Eerily expressive. Only one personal negative... no full backside shots of Serena in the suit before it was removed.

  • 4

Irrespective of her great body, somehow the glasses ramp up Mila's "hotness" by a factor of 10.

  • 1

I know what I want for my birthday. But I'll settle for as many sets of this beauty as you can shoot Mr. Arkisi.

  • 1

Outstanding! Great choice of set, lighting and shots - not to mention Selina herself. The frames with Selina with the gauzy, far-away looking into the light remind me of so many shots in bridal magazines. Personally, I'd take ten of these sets to every "explicit/masturbatory" one you publish - not that there's anything wrong with those sets - I'd just much rather see this kind of work. This is where I think your work really shines. Thanks.

  • 1

Sigh... there but for the grace of God...

  • 0

It was (and is) as is all of your work with Aislin. Just happened to notice the thing about the eyes and thought I'd mention it.

In days long gone by when I was working, there was no auto-focus on film-based cameras and we were always drilled in to shooting tack-sharp eyes. Now, in the "digital age", what with all the new wiz-bangs on every camera, I guess a photographer really shouldn't be faulted if some part of a frame or two out of every set doesn't get quite the focus that they want.

Still, you do great work and I always look forward to your new offerings.

  • 0

Very nice second set Arkisi. Cute hazel eyes to go with the blonde(ish) hair. Next time, try talking her into going with letting her natural hair color come through - would really like to see that.

  • 0

A rather well-done set but, with Aislin, how could it not be otherwise? The problem I have with it is that overall, the focus in the set's not as sharp as it could/should be. If you look at Aislin's eyes in frames #s 6 & 8 for instance, either one or both of them aren't in sharp focus and although the "focus" as it were, was on other things, I'm sorry, any time you have a relative close-up of a face, the eyes should be in sharp focus.

  • 1

Butt please... please... pay her some more money! The poor thing can't even afford a simple pair of panties to go with that nice top of hers.

  • 1

Well _fer_... maybe not ALL the time, but enough lately that it seems to be getting a bit repetitive. Seems like one vice is being traded for another set of vices.

Offhand though Arkisi, generally, your expected well-done work... with the exception of one thing. Why where the first page of photos so off-ballancedly orange? I realize the orange towel/throw contributed to _some_ of it but, those photos, as compared to the rest of the set _are_ markedly off-color.

And, quite frankly, as our friend _fer_realz_ has noted, a rather high uptick in masturbation-related photos lately seems to have invaded your site. Is this going to be the "norm" from here on out?

Don't get me wrong, for the most part, your work is impeccable in execution and generally of superior content and/or style but this trend towards a high number of masturbation shots is, at least to me, disturbing to say the least. Is there any reason why the site seems to be going this way?

Thanks for your efforts though.

  • 0

Just a curious observation on my part as to your statement _fer_.

With what you've voiced here about the "obstructed view", I'm curious as to what your feelings are/were about the "EXPLICIT" set with Elizabeth L. Do toys & appliances fall into the same category as fingers?

Jes wonderin'...

As for THIS set with Alla... the glasses paired with the "schoolgirl" set are a refreshing change of pace, Arkisi and I think Alla pulls it off really well (if that's what was intended).

  • 0

Cute girl with a nice body (thanks for the heels - somehow makes her legs look even better) but not so sure about the dildo. Think I'd prefer to speculate about what she'd be doing than to actually SEE it. As _fer_realz_ intimates, perhaps a movie would better convey the sentiment/feeling - not entirely sure still photos do it.

  • 1

Among other things, really, really great looking legs nicely shot. Probably shouldn't ever be photographed without wearing heels (at least at the beginning of the set).

  • 0

Zsanett has always and probably will always be one of my top 5 models ever presented. That cute little overbite, that beautiful dark hair combined with that pale skin and those deadly blue eyes hit home with me every time. As a matter of fact, I honestly don't think I'd like her as much if she had dark, Mediterranean-colored skin.

  • 1

Arkisi... 30-40 more sets of this wonderful woman would be a good start.

  • 0

Just bra or a pair of panties while in the kitchen always leads to ideas of "something else" going on or having just gone on.

One of the things I dearly love about Kenya is the thin line of fine, wispy dark hair that runs between her navel and her pubes.

I'd also love to see her presented with a slightly fuller bush than the little landing strip she sports now.

  • 1

Not sure in whose home/apartment or hotel this was shot in, but the bright red cabinetry is an absolutely outstanding accent to Caddy's pale skin and the black lace basque that she's wearing. Caddy's dark hair is a perfect match to the black lace she's wearing and that, combined with her hair matched against her skin make this a great set. That, and the fact that she's got a dynamite body, all make for a really interesting set.

  • 2

What a babe.

  • 1

Milk! It does a body good.

  • 1

You have a choice; milk, mud or sand... take your pick. You MUST choose one. Personally, I'd rather be lapping up milk than mud or sand.

  • 1

I wasn't thinking straight when I first saw the thumbnails for this set. I thought "Why is he starting Gloria off with her lacy underthings halfway down her legs already?" until I saw Arimein's comment below. I hadn't even recalled Gloria's prior opening to this set.

I've noticed that Arkisi's technical handling of available natural daylight for sets has been great lately. Colors and shadows are truer and have less color casts to them.

And as for Gloria herself...frames #s 6 & 7 stopped me right in my tracks. Gloria has another one of those faces that are real show-stoppers... and the rest of her ain't so bad either...

  • 0

There are two things I would have done to this set. 1) Trade off the pale yellow panties for black ones. The yellow ones blend in too much to the overall background, set and overall general "light" feel to the set. Black panties would have served as the perfect counterpoint to Yassa's very dark (black?) hair and her overall generally light skin tone.

2) Get her to smile a bit. At times, Yassa almost looks as if she's timid or afraid of what she's doing. She's smiled in some of her other sets so I can be reasonably sure that this kind of modeling doesn't intimidate or embarrass her.

  • 0

Something about Gracie's breasts just says to me "milk-chocolate, melt-in-your-mouth-goodness".

  • 0

Loved the choice of lipstick shade - not too garishly bright - just enough to set her delicious mouth off agains her pale skin, black hair and black sweater dress. Could have gone just a wee bit lighter on the rouge - though I like the way it sets off her high-set cheekbones.

  • 0

Vixen-like and, at the same time very, very cute. :-)

Missed the obligatory "erect-nipple-poking-through-the-fabric-holes" shot though. :-(

  • 0

I will be eternally sorry for having said this but image #20... I cannot possibly imagine how um... er... soft and squishy Li Moon's breasts could possibly be. In certain images i.e. #s 6 & 19, they appear to be of the firmest construction possible... but I know that can't possibly be true. They are, for want of a better term, outstanding. And so is the smile that she sports constantly. A kind of fuller-breasted version of Nikia or Jeff Milton.

This young woman just reeks with a happy/playful mood about her.

  • 0

This is obviously a continuation of the "Mire" set you loved so well.

It seems odd, but in "splitting" the set up into two distinct parts (something Arkisi has done before) Clarice (to me at least) seems to have managed to bring across two distinctly different "feelings" with each part. At least to me, this part of the set seems like she's saying "Hurry up Arkisi - I'm getting tired of doing this right now."

  • 0

Really, really nice use of light and shadow on Clarice. Love the bright red lipstick - it helps tie her in with the red color of the throw she's reclining on. Only detractor, she seems to be kind of disinterested throughout most of the set. With the exception of a very few shots where she's half-smiling, it just seems to me that she'd rather be somewhere else doing something different.

  • 0

Once again, grate mines thimk alike!

When I first saw the cover shot of this set of Gloria I said to myself "Self, this woman has the most perfectly symmetrical labia I've even been fortunate to view, either pictorially or in person." Perfectly arranged/groomed for a cover shot. And I'm sorry, but the blood-based origin of the candy pink color she evinces is a perfect compliment to the color of the bustier she's wearing, her wonderful rosy areolae in conjunction with the vivid pink pillow on the furniture.

The only down thing is, that while she DOES indeed smile, it sometimes seems a bit forced (not at all like a mirror-shattering smile from Lorena Garcia). But that's just a minor nit-pick on my part.

  • 0

Great use of a colorful location and natural lighting. Of course, it helps when you're shooting a woman like Nika.

  • 0

@ Arkisi

This kind of set I'd appreciate seeing more often. It's become almost too easy to simply light a model and have her go through "the motions" or "the numbers" as it were and to present Mila this way takes/took a lot of thought and preparation to get it this good. Love the colors, the lighting and the moody feel throughout it.

  • 0

_fer_.... it's been said to others time and again, but I can hardly believe you'd need to be reminded that this was most probably exactly the way Mila wanted this particular set done. We both know she's not shy about showing us "the goods"

  • 0

Yarina + Hark a??? You spell check is so broken & corrupted it needs to be wiped out and the database replaced.

I've seen Arkisi use this location before with similar results. While Yarina is indeed wonderful, her overall skin tone taken with the lighting and the wooden tabletop almost allows her to blend into the overall set color - kind of turns into a monotone set. If that's the intent, then so be it.

I would have much rather seen either some other way of lighting Yarina or a move to a less overall "orangish/brown" area of the house.

  • 0

On a more contemporary note... Li Moon has one of the most well... almost zaftig bodies I've ever had the opportunity of viewing. But of course, at her tender age... well, what else would you expect?

The only down-side I can think of is that she looks like she just might have one of those really high-pitched squeaky voices that I really can't take. You know the kind I mean - the ones that sound like fingernails on a blackboard?

  • 1

Recall the scene in a movie where W.C. Fields was a train conductor dealing with a woman who had an unruly child who was bothering the train's passengers and said something like "If madam would follow me to the dining car maybe we can get you a complimentary meal - and maybe we can find a banana for your little monkey."?

Oooh-oooh eee-eee aah-aah

  • 1

'Bout par _fer_ da course... you got (banana) mush _fer_ branes. ;-)

On the positive side... well... there's just really no positive side... I was jes' tryin' to give it a positive spin...

But mind my words now _Furry_... no monkeyin' around...

  • 1

@ Arkisi

BTW... nice use of the available outdoor lighting.

  • 1

Another fine example of "showy" lingerie - less than practical but oh so nice. Great body to display it on. Nice shots of the bra but why was the bottom given such short shrift?

And, as Tommy Lee Jones once said "Why ... so... serious?"

  • 1

That is, the girls were naked, not himself.

Never got any complaints - either from the girls, the passersby the campus police or administration.

  • 1

Curiously, I went to UNI back in the '70s (no... 1970s not 1870s) with a guy who was (and continues to be) a photographer who often wished he could do away with the camera, load film into one ear and, by pulling it out the other side of his head, expose the film with his eyes, recording in perfect detail and focus what his eyes had seen and his brane had recorded. Miguel always had a way with the camera - was from Ecuador and was nearsighted, wearing little rectangular rimless glasses with tiny gold wire ear pieces that let him "mash up" the lenses right against the viewfinder of his Nikkormat. Kind of a goofy kid (weren't we all at that age) that always seemed to attract the most beautiful babes wherever he went. Always shot the absolute hottest babes on campus in some of the most bizarre situations - like naked with dogs in a fountain in the middle of the campus commons with hundreds of people walking by - absolutely fearless. Well-known professional photographer now.

  • 2

Your brane works differently than mine. "...classy society lady..." who just happens to enjoy showing the world all her (understandably) marvelous bits... what a curious association. I can understand the ballerina well enough...

But Clarice IS quite cute. I like the natural lighting and the color of her lipstick seems just the right color for her in this set - not too bright red to seem garish.

  • 0

Some very interesting and provocative poses with this dark-haired woman. Something tells me however that she'd score much higher if she'd out-and-out smile now and then. The hard, cold stares get a bit tiring after a while.

  • 1

Uh... not to be too politically UN-correct, but I'd bet you'd be whistling another tune altogether if they were YOUR fingers... or even if you were there in person during the shoot. ;-)

  • 0

BTW sir... you did a movie of Loretta a while back entitled "Motela". I didn't watch it, but I thought the cover thumbnail photo was excellently done. Please tell me that you have a set of still photographs buried somewhere waiting to be uploaded.

  • 1

Gee... it's sure is FUN pokin' the bear (however much he growls).

I was just tryin' to get a rise outta you ;-)

With respect to my second (or third) post - I'm old... I get kinda lost real easy... what did you think about frame #18? I know what I saw when she turned around wasn't at all what I was expecting. But don't they look soooo comfy? Like something you'd like to rub your cheek up against? Kind of a "cheek-to-cheek" kind of thing. ;-)

And nones comprehendes senior y senitorita.

  • 0

@@ FURRY


BTBTW... ① What if Loretta LIKES these? They're her _favorite_ panties. She loves the way they feel. ② If you looked at ONLY frame #18, I'll be willing to bet that you would have something favourable to say about them - the way they "gently cling to her marvelous bottom" or some such.

  • 2

@ FURRY...


BTW... if you ever got past the first page and those "offensive" panties, you might have noticed that there are 5 GREAT portrait shots of Loretta on the second page of the thumbnails (3 of which are really, really outstanding - way to go on those Arkisi - more like that will always be appreciated - at least by me).

I'd even go so fas as to say that, were you there assisting Arkisi and Loretta said that she needed some "help" with her clothing, you'd have bounded right up there like a kitten chasing a ball of catnip-smelling yarn. Maybe she wore them as shock-value just for you! ;-)

  • 1

Other than rambling on mindlessly about "control-top 'granny panties'" in no less than 63 words, how did you like the set? ;-) Did you notice the color of Loretta's eyes? Does she even have eyes? Colors of the clothing she was wearing (hint, it's a shirt)? Was she smiling?

Sheesh! When you go off the deep-end on something, it's a really short walk for you ain't it? ;-)

  • 1

My favorite pink-nosed puppies are back!

Will take her under any name she chooses and with any hair color she wishes to display - except bubblegum pink... THAT I don't think I could take.

  • 2

The cover shot of this set just drew me in, like Serena's beautiful eyes.

And that little black bow just screams "naughty & nice".

Great set (with a model like Serena it's hard NOT to produce an engaging work), nice use of natural lighting and the warm wood-framed doors lend a nice accent.

  • 0

Some VERY nice poses shot on top of the furniture (49, & 59-61) that I've not seen done before. And Lija certainly has a way of working to the camera that, even though these particular frames aren't particularly "explicit", they have a certain quality about them that speaks to the soul of eroticism.

Well done sir! These are the kinds of shots I gladly pay a membership for.

  • 0

Amelie's always been high on my favorites list, but this set seems to lack some of the spark of her earlier sets. It seems a bit formulaic in it's presentation of her. Additionally, Amelie has this marvelous smile, sometimes bordering on the devilish smirk but, save for one or two shots, I didn't see any of this in this set. And shooting her in the bathtub with no water in it (let alone soapy bubbles) seems kind of a waste to me.

Still... it IS Amelie...

  • 0

I wonder if the resident breast expert still thinks these are "implants" that Lydia is sporting.

  • 0

Does the tag "rabbit desire" have the connotation I think it does?

  • 0

Sometimes, Lydia displays this kind of impish/coquettish look about her like in frame 3s 6,7 & 18, that absolutely makes me melt.

  • 1

Frame #8 is possibly one of the best of these kinds of shots I've seen executed, either with Sania or any other model. Somehow, it just seems to frame her derriere perfectly. The colors are great with her pale skin color and just seem to work naturally for her.

  • 1

i, much like you, enjoy seeing most models in some form of clothing and/or lingerie in their sets, especially the introductory sets where a model appears to be just learning what she's doing and what's going on in shooting the set.

In this set, Zola's got that whole "Oh gee... this is fun." kind of thing going on - or maybe it was just the music while she was being shot or what was being said during the shooting - jokes and such.

I like seeing shots like frames #s 18-19 - all too often you see a model sliding her panties down a delicious derriere of down her legs and then BAM! - they're off - as if they magically disentangles themselves from her legs.

i've mentioned it before but I think it bears repeating. One of the sexiest shots i ever did was just of a model's lower leg & foot with her panties dangling from her ankle. Nothing exposed except her lower leg, ankle and foot but it leaves a lot to the imagination.

My only minor quibble with this set is the color of Zola's bra & panties - what with her pale skin - they practically disappear in the frames.

Other than that, Zola seems like she genuinely had a fun time doing this set and I hope Arkisi has plans for lots more sets.

  • 1

I mean there's not really much in the field of view by which one can measure Sofi's "tininess" is there?

  • 1

Furry...you're right about tiny not being a bad thing but riddle me this Batman...

You're on one side of a monitor, the size of which is probably less than 32" diagonally measured. Sofi's image is displayed on your monitor's screen. Ipso facto she MUST be tiny... unless of course you're viewing her image at life-sized resolution.

On the other hand... if you've removed your Mr. Magoo glasses, then she'd look tiny AND blurry.

  • 2

You actually went so far as to look at her stilettos? Better man than I am sir!

  • 0

Love the white flower accent in Solana's dark hair. Nicely shot set.

Not that they can be trusted, but published measurements can't be right (29-31-27). Makes for a VERY strange looking model.

  • 1

Alliteration alert! Alliteration alert! "... perfect, pink portal to paradise..." - how old ARE you??? ;-)

BTW... thanks for frame #39. Says a lot without showing anything.

And Mila's got that whole "look back over the shoulder" thing down pat. If she hasn't modeled before, she certainly knows how to do it instinctively.

  • 1

It's funny, but the first thing I was drawn to about Mila weren't her breasts (spectacular though they are) it was, as with a few other models, her face. She has great facial structure and, from all appearances, she knows how to "work to the camera" with that face and the expressive use of her hands.

Now, as to the rest of her... a true find.

  • 0

You sir, have the unenviable task of finding new ways to present this wonderful woman to the world so that most, if not all, of the members find something they like.

Kerby's comment , while s/he certainly has the right to make it, provides scarce little input for you as a photographer and Zsanett as a model to go about providing something of a greater interest to them.

I've always thought your work with her particularly hard with those mesmerizing blue eyes and slightly evil, impish grin she sometimes sports. A face that fights for a viewer's attention, at times, even moreso than her wonderful body.

Keep presenting her the way you do and you'll scarcely have any unhappy members.

  • 0

Anyone who says they don't enjoy being Moon-ed is just a plain lying dirty dog and can't appreciate the finer things in life. ;-)

  • 0

Really liked what you did with this set - even with the "limited" abilities of Ms. Zelda's photographic experience. ;-)

Wish you'd been able to do something with her in this set/lighting combination vis-à-vis showing her in either street clothes or lingerie as in ANIMA, MEIDEMA or NAVNET posted over on . Too many sets leaving these out.

Other than that, really nice work with a great subject matter.

  • 1

If I send xtra $$$, £££ or €€€ would you agree to post many more sets with this ravishing beauty?

  • 0

Would have loved to see a full compliment of lingerie under that sheer black dressing gown i.e. bra or bustier and certainly stockings.

Other than that, Pammie's one of my very favorite black-haired models on this or any site.

  • 4

Irrespective of her great body, somehow the glasses ramp up Mila's "hotness" by a factor of 10.

  • 2

Uh... er... 'scuse me miss... can I give you a hand and hold those for you?

Simple set and lighting for a _very_ complex woman. Nicely done to you Mila... and you too Arkisi. (Of course, with Mila, this could have been done with a Kodak Instamatic and a box of flash cubes. Hard to take a bad photo of her.) ;-)

  • 2

Outstanding set of images (how could it be otherwise with Serena?) shot in great light. Eerily expressive. Only one personal negative... no full backside shots of Serena in the suit before it was removed.

  • 2

What a babe.

  • 2

Your brane works differently than mine. "...classy society lady..." who just happens to enjoy showing the world all her (understandably) marvelous bits... what a curious association. I can understand the ballerina well enough...

But Clarice IS quite cute. I like the natural lighting and the color of her lipstick seems just the right color for her in this set - not too bright red to seem garish.

  • 2

@ FURRY...


BTW... if you ever got past the first page and those "offensive" panties, you might have noticed that there are 5 GREAT portrait shots of Loretta on the second page of the thumbnails (3 of which are really, really outstanding - way to go on those Arkisi - more like that will always be appreciated - at least by me).

I'd even go so fas as to say that, were you there assisting Arkisi and Loretta said that she needed some "help" with her clothing, you'd have bounded right up there like a kitten chasing a ball of catnip-smelling yarn. Maybe she wore them as shock-value just for you! ;-)

  • 2

The cover shot of this set just drew me in, like Serena's beautiful eyes.

And that little black bow just screams "naughty & nice".

Great set (with a model like Serena it's hard NOT to produce an engaging work), nice use of natural lighting and the warm wood-framed doors lend a nice accent.

  • 2

You actually went so far as to look at her stilettos? Better man than I am sir!

  • 1

Yeah... butt only one of your favorite shots in the whole set.

  • 1

I know what I want for my birthday. But I'll settle for as many sets of this beauty as you can shoot Mr. Arkisi.

  • 1

Outstanding! Great choice of set, lighting and shots - not to mention Selina herself. The frames with Selina with the gauzy, far-away looking into the light remind me of so many shots in bridal magazines. Personally, I'd take ten of these sets to every "explicit/masturbatory" one you publish - not that there's anything wrong with those sets - I'd just much rather see this kind of work. This is where I think your work really shines. Thanks.

  • 1

Sigh... there but for the grace of God...

  • 1

Butt please... please... pay her some more money! The poor thing can't even afford a simple pair of panties to go with that nice top of hers.

  • 1

Well _fer_... maybe not ALL the time, but enough lately that it seems to be getting a bit repetitive. Seems like one vice is being traded for another set of vices.

Offhand though Arkisi, generally, your expected well-done work... with the exception of one thing. Why where the first page of photos so off-ballancedly orange? I realize the orange towel/throw contributed to _some_ of it but, those photos, as compared to the rest of the set _are_ markedly off-color.

And, quite frankly, as our friend _fer_realz_ has noted, a rather high uptick in masturbation-related photos lately seems to have invaded your site. Is this going to be the "norm" from here on out?

Don't get me wrong, for the most part, your work is impeccable in execution and generally of superior content and/or style but this trend towards a high number of masturbation shots is, at least to me, disturbing to say the least. Is there any reason why the site seems to be going this way?

Thanks for your efforts though.

  • 1

Among other things, really, really great looking legs nicely shot. Probably shouldn't ever be photographed without wearing heels (at least at the beginning of the set).

  • 1

Arkisi... 30-40 more sets of this wonderful woman would be a good start.

  • 1

Not sure in whose home/apartment or hotel this was shot in, but the bright red cabinetry is an absolutely outstanding accent to Caddy's pale skin and the black lace basque that she's wearing. Caddy's dark hair is a perfect match to the black lace she's wearing and that, combined with her hair matched against her skin make this a great set. That, and the fact that she's got a dynamite body, all make for a really interesting set.

  • 1

Milk! It does a body good.

  • 1

You have a choice; milk, mud or sand... take your pick. You MUST choose one. Personally, I'd rather be lapping up milk than mud or sand.

  • 1

I wasn't thinking straight when I first saw the thumbnails for this set. I thought "Why is he starting Gloria off with her lacy underthings halfway down her legs already?" until I saw Arimein's comment below. I hadn't even recalled Gloria's prior opening to this set.

I've noticed that Arkisi's technical handling of available natural daylight for sets has been great lately. Colors and shadows are truer and have less color casts to them.

And as for Gloria herself...frames #s 6 & 7 stopped me right in my tracks. Gloria has another one of those faces that are real show-stoppers... and the rest of her ain't so bad either...

  • 1

Recall the scene in a movie where W.C. Fields was a train conductor dealing with a woman who had an unruly child who was bothering the train's passengers and said something like "If madam would follow me to the dining car maybe we can get you a complimentary meal - and maybe we can find a banana for your little monkey."?

Oooh-oooh eee-eee aah-aah

  • 1

'Bout par _fer_ da course... you got (banana) mush _fer_ branes. ;-)

On the positive side... well... there's just really no positive side... I was jes' tryin' to give it a positive spin...

But mind my words now _Furry_... no monkeyin' around...

  • 1

@ Arkisi

BTW... nice use of the available outdoor lighting.

  • 1

Another fine example of "showy" lingerie - less than practical but oh so nice. Great body to display it on. Nice shots of the bra but why was the bottom given such short shrift?

And, as Tommy Lee Jones once said "Why ... so... serious?"

  • 1

That is, the girls were naked, not himself.

Never got any complaints - either from the girls, the passersby the campus police or administration.

  • 1

Curiously, I went to UNI back in the '70s (no... 1970s not 1870s) with a guy who was (and continues to be) a photographer who often wished he could do away with the camera, load film into one ear and, by pulling it out the other side of his head, expose the film with his eyes, recording in perfect detail and focus what his eyes had seen and his brane had recorded. Miguel always had a way with the camera - was from Ecuador and was nearsighted, wearing little rectangular rimless glasses with tiny gold wire ear pieces that let him "mash up" the lenses right against the viewfinder of his Nikkormat. Kind of a goofy kid (weren't we all at that age) that always seemed to attract the most beautiful babes wherever he went. Always shot the absolute hottest babes on campus in some of the most bizarre situations - like naked with dogs in a fountain in the middle of the campus commons with hundreds of people walking by - absolutely fearless. Well-known professional photographer now.

  • 1

Uh... not to be too politically UN-correct, but I'd bet you'd be whistling another tune altogether if they were YOUR fingers... or even if you were there in person during the shoot. ;-)

  • 1

Gee... it's sure is FUN pokin' the bear (however much he growls).

I was just tryin' to get a rise outta you ;-)

With respect to my second (or third) post - I'm old... I get kinda lost real easy... what did you think about frame #18? I know what I saw when she turned around wasn't at all what I was expecting. But don't they look soooo comfy? Like something you'd like to rub your cheek up against? Kind of a "cheek-to-cheek" kind of thing. ;-)

And nones comprehendes senior y senitorita.

  • 1

Other than rambling on mindlessly about "control-top 'granny panties'" in no less than 63 words, how did you like the set? ;-) Did you notice the color of Loretta's eyes? Does she even have eyes? Colors of the clothing she was wearing (hint, it's a shirt)? Was she smiling?

Sheesh! When you go off the deep-end on something, it's a really short walk for you ain't it? ;-)

  • 1

My favorite pink-nosed puppies are back!

Will take her under any name she chooses and with any hair color she wishes to display - except bubblegum pink... THAT I don't think I could take.

  • 1

Frame #8 is possibly one of the best of these kinds of shots I've seen executed, either with Sania or any other model. Somehow, it just seems to frame her derriere perfectly. The colors are great with her pale skin color and just seem to work naturally for her.

  • 1

i, much like you, enjoy seeing most models in some form of clothing and/or lingerie in their sets, especially the introductory sets where a model appears to be just learning what she's doing and what's going on in shooting the set.

In this set, Zola's got that whole "Oh gee... this is fun." kind of thing going on - or maybe it was just the music while she was being shot or what was being said during the shooting - jokes and such.

I like seeing shots like frames #s 18-19 - all too often you see a model sliding her panties down a delicious derriere of down her legs and then BAM! - they're off - as if they magically disentangles themselves from her legs.

i've mentioned it before but I think it bears repeating. One of the sexiest shots i ever did was just of a model's lower leg & foot with her panties dangling from her ankle. Nothing exposed except her lower leg, ankle and foot but it leaves a lot to the imagination.

My only minor quibble with this set is the color of Zola's bra & panties - what with her pale skin - they practically disappear in the frames.

Other than that, Zola seems like she genuinely had a fun time doing this set and I hope Arkisi has plans for lots more sets.

  • 1

I mean there's not really much in the field of view by which one can measure Sofi's "tininess" is there?

  • 1

Furry...you're right about tiny not being a bad thing but riddle me this Batman...

You're on one side of a monitor, the size of which is probably less than 32" diagonally measured. Sofi's image is displayed on your monitor's screen. Ipso facto she MUST be tiny... unless of course you're viewing her image at life-sized resolution.

On the other hand... if you've removed your Mr. Magoo glasses, then she'd look tiny AND blurry.

  • 1

Alliteration alert! Alliteration alert! "... perfect, pink portal to paradise..." - how old ARE you??? ;-)

BTW... thanks for frame #39. Says a lot without showing anything.

And Mila's got that whole "look back over the shoulder" thing down pat. If she hasn't modeled before, she certainly knows how to do it instinctively.

  • 1

It's funny, but the first thing I was drawn to about Mila weren't her breasts (spectacular though they are) it was, as with a few other models, her face. She has great facial structure and, from all appearances, she knows how to "work to the camera" with that face and the expressive use of her hands.

Now, as to the rest of her... a true find.

  • 1

If I send xtra $$$, £££ or €€€ would you agree to post many more sets with this ravishing beauty?

  • 0

Nice enough looking woman Arkisi but something went wrong with the file upload - all the shots throughout the set are far too yellow in overall color cast.

  • 0

It was (and is) as is all of your work with Aislin. Just happened to notice the thing about the eyes and thought I'd mention it.

In days long gone by when I was working, there was no auto-focus on film-based cameras and we were always drilled in to shooting tack-sharp eyes. Now, in the "digital age", what with all the new wiz-bangs on every camera, I guess a photographer really shouldn't be faulted if some part of a frame or two out of every set doesn't get quite the focus that they want.

Still, you do great work and I always look forward to your new offerings.

  • 0

Very nice second set Arkisi. Cute hazel eyes to go with the blonde(ish) hair. Next time, try talking her into going with letting her natural hair color come through - would really like to see that.

  • 0

A rather well-done set but, with Aislin, how could it not be otherwise? The problem I have with it is that overall, the focus in the set's not as sharp as it could/should be. If you look at Aislin's eyes in frames #s 6 & 8 for instance, either one or both of them aren't in sharp focus and although the "focus" as it were, was on other things, I'm sorry, any time you have a relative close-up of a face, the eyes should be in sharp focus.

  • 0

Just a curious observation on my part as to your statement _fer_.

With what you've voiced here about the "obstructed view", I'm curious as to what your feelings are/were about the "EXPLICIT" set with Elizabeth L. Do toys & appliances fall into the same category as fingers?

Jes wonderin'...

As for THIS set with Alla... the glasses paired with the "schoolgirl" set are a refreshing change of pace, Arkisi and I think Alla pulls it off really well (if that's what was intended).

  • 0

Cute girl with a nice body (thanks for the heels - somehow makes her legs look even better) but not so sure about the dildo. Think I'd prefer to speculate about what she'd be doing than to actually SEE it. As _fer_realz_ intimates, perhaps a movie would better convey the sentiment/feeling - not entirely sure still photos do it.

  • 0

Zsanett has always and probably will always be one of my top 5 models ever presented. That cute little overbite, that beautiful dark hair combined with that pale skin and those deadly blue eyes hit home with me every time. As a matter of fact, I honestly don't think I'd like her as much if she had dark, Mediterranean-colored skin.

  • 0

Just bra or a pair of panties while in the kitchen always leads to ideas of "something else" going on or having just gone on.

One of the things I dearly love about Kenya is the thin line of fine, wispy dark hair that runs between her navel and her pubes.

I'd also love to see her presented with a slightly fuller bush than the little landing strip she sports now.

  • 0

There are two things I would have done to this set. 1) Trade off the pale yellow panties for black ones. The yellow ones blend in too much to the overall background, set and overall general "light" feel to the set. Black panties would have served as the perfect counterpoint to Yassa's very dark (black?) hair and her overall generally light skin tone.

2) Get her to smile a bit. At times, Yassa almost looks as if she's timid or afraid of what she's doing. She's smiled in some of her other sets so I can be reasonably sure that this kind of modeling doesn't intimidate or embarrass her.

  • 0

Something about Gracie's breasts just says to me "milk-chocolate, melt-in-your-mouth-goodness".

  • 0

Loved the choice of lipstick shade - not too garishly bright - just enough to set her delicious mouth off agains her pale skin, black hair and black sweater dress. Could have gone just a wee bit lighter on the rouge - though I like the way it sets off her high-set cheekbones.

  • 0

Vixen-like and, at the same time very, very cute. :-)

Missed the obligatory "erect-nipple-poking-through-the-fabric-holes" shot though. :-(

  • 0

I will be eternally sorry for having said this but image #20... I cannot possibly imagine how um... er... soft and squishy Li Moon's breasts could possibly be. In certain images i.e. #s 6 & 19, they appear to be of the firmest construction possible... but I know that can't possibly be true. They are, for want of a better term, outstanding. And so is the smile that she sports constantly. A kind of fuller-breasted version of Nikia or Jeff Milton.

This young woman just reeks with a happy/playful mood about her.

  • 0

This is obviously a continuation of the "Mire" set you loved so well.

It seems odd, but in "splitting" the set up into two distinct parts (something Arkisi has done before) Clarice (to me at least) seems to have managed to bring across two distinctly different "feelings" with each part. At least to me, this part of the set seems like she's saying "Hurry up Arkisi - I'm getting tired of doing this right now."

  • 0

Really, really nice use of light and shadow on Clarice. Love the bright red lipstick - it helps tie her in with the red color of the throw she's reclining on. Only detractor, she seems to be kind of disinterested throughout most of the set. With the exception of a very few shots where she's half-smiling, it just seems to me that she'd rather be somewhere else doing something different.

  • 0

Once again, grate mines thimk alike!

When I first saw the cover shot of this set of Gloria I said to myself "Self, this woman has the most perfectly symmetrical labia I've even been fortunate to view, either pictorially or in person." Perfectly arranged/groomed for a cover shot. And I'm sorry, but the blood-based origin of the candy pink color she evinces is a perfect compliment to the color of the bustier she's wearing, her wonderful rosy areolae in conjunction with the vivid pink pillow on the furniture.

The only down thing is, that while she DOES indeed smile, it sometimes seems a bit forced (not at all like a mirror-shattering smile from Lorena Garcia). But that's just a minor nit-pick on my part.

  • 0

Great use of a colorful location and natural lighting. Of course, it helps when you're shooting a woman like Nika.

  • 0

@ Arkisi

This kind of set I'd appreciate seeing more often. It's become almost too easy to simply light a model and have her go through "the motions" or "the numbers" as it were and to present Mila this way takes/took a lot of thought and preparation to get it this good. Love the colors, the lighting and the moody feel throughout it.

  • 0

_fer_.... it's been said to others time and again, but I can hardly believe you'd need to be reminded that this was most probably exactly the way Mila wanted this particular set done. We both know she's not shy about showing us "the goods"

  • 0

Yarina + Hark a??? You spell check is so broken & corrupted it needs to be wiped out and the database replaced.

I've seen Arkisi use this location before with similar results. While Yarina is indeed wonderful, her overall skin tone taken with the lighting and the wooden tabletop almost allows her to blend into the overall set color - kind of turns into a monotone set. If that's the intent, then so be it.

I would have much rather seen either some other way of lighting Yarina or a move to a less overall "orangish/brown" area of the house.

  • 0

On a more contemporary note... Li Moon has one of the most well... almost zaftig bodies I've ever had the opportunity of viewing. But of course, at her tender age... well, what else would you expect?

The only down-side I can think of is that she looks like she just might have one of those really high-pitched squeaky voices that I really can't take. You know the kind I mean - the ones that sound like fingernails on a blackboard?

  • 0

Some very interesting and provocative poses with this dark-haired woman. Something tells me however that she'd score much higher if she'd out-and-out smile now and then. The hard, cold stares get a bit tiring after a while.

  • 0

BTW sir... you did a movie of Loretta a while back entitled "Motela". I didn't watch it, but I thought the cover thumbnail photo was excellently done. Please tell me that you have a set of still photographs buried somewhere waiting to be uploaded.

  • 0

@@ FURRY


BTBTW... ① What if Loretta LIKES these? They're her _favorite_ panties. She loves the way they feel. ② If you looked at ONLY frame #18, I'll be willing to bet that you would have something favourable to say about them - the way they "gently cling to her marvelous bottom" or some such.

  • 0

Some VERY nice poses shot on top of the furniture (49, & 59-61) that I've not seen done before. And Lija certainly has a way of working to the camera that, even though these particular frames aren't particularly "explicit", they have a certain quality about them that speaks to the soul of eroticism.

Well done sir! These are the kinds of shots I gladly pay a membership for.

  • 0

Amelie's always been high on my favorites list, but this set seems to lack some of the spark of her earlier sets. It seems a bit formulaic in it's presentation of her. Additionally, Amelie has this marvelous smile, sometimes bordering on the devilish smirk but, save for one or two shots, I didn't see any of this in this set. And shooting her in the bathtub with no water in it (let alone soapy bubbles) seems kind of a waste to me.

Still... it IS Amelie...

  • 0

I wonder if the resident breast expert still thinks these are "implants" that Lydia is sporting.

  • 0

Does the tag "rabbit desire" have the connotation I think it does?

  • 0

Sometimes, Lydia displays this kind of impish/coquettish look about her like in frame 3s 6,7 & 18, that absolutely makes me melt.

  • 0

Love the white flower accent in Solana's dark hair. Nicely shot set.

Not that they can be trusted, but published measurements can't be right (29-31-27). Makes for a VERY strange looking model.

  • 0

You sir, have the unenviable task of finding new ways to present this wonderful woman to the world so that most, if not all, of the members find something they like.

Kerby's comment , while s/he certainly has the right to make it, provides scarce little input for you as a photographer and Zsanett as a model to go about providing something of a greater interest to them.

I've always thought your work with her particularly hard with those mesmerizing blue eyes and slightly evil, impish grin she sometimes sports. A face that fights for a viewer's attention, at times, even moreso than her wonderful body.

Keep presenting her the way you do and you'll scarcely have any unhappy members.

  • 0

Anyone who says they don't enjoy being Moon-ed is just a plain lying dirty dog and can't appreciate the finer things in life. ;-)

  • 0

Really liked what you did with this set - even with the "limited" abilities of Ms. Zelda's photographic experience. ;-)

Wish you'd been able to do something with her in this set/lighting combination vis-à-vis showing her in either street clothes or lingerie as in ANIMA, MEIDEMA or NAVNET posted over on . Too many sets leaving these out.

Other than that, really nice work with a great subject matter.

  • 0

Would have loved to see a full compliment of lingerie under that sheer black dressing gown i.e. bra or bustier and certainly stockings.

Other than that, Pammie's one of my very favorite black-haired models on this or any site.

  • 0

Good eye, Arkie! One sequence, actually, though it was a shamefully short one. (:

Hoping we see more hands & knees, bent over, FD/AU sequences in the next set. You know, the full set that appears on MA. :D

  • 0

Now she is black so I postponed the work - wait for where the all things would go :(

  • 0

Unfortunately, modern cameras (even the best ones) are still not taught to focus right in the low light conditions, so the percent of bad images grows. That is the situation when you have to decide is it still worth to publish them OR not!

BTW where is my Yorick?

  • 0

Thats ok, sometimes sh!t happens but those images you pointed out are not close-ups at all. Hope #39 will be a compensation for you.

  • 1

Oh, don't worry - this is just because SA stop taking masturbation sets (temporarily)

  • 0

I can't speak for_ Fer_, but understand where he's coming from. Now I liked this set of Alla, maybe a couple more unobstructed, enticing spread shots could have made it even better.
Today MA had a set of Noreen, not a huge fan of her, BUT, that photo set had many very seductive and enticing poses, which I like a lot, and think is very much the type of poses _fer_ is wanting to see more of.
I have been trying the different MA sites since I first joined not long ago.
Sex Art had some great movies without a doubt, but, I found the photo sets to be for the most part lacking, and to me Photos are still King, needless to say I didn't renew my subscription. MA also had a special, so I tried Al's Scan, and Holly Randall.
But Al's scan, I'm just Not into seeing girls stick various foreign objects into their pussies, again, after I write this I am canceling both. Toys work in video Only, not in stills.

Rylsky, SexArt, Al's scan, and, Holly Randall, didn't make the cut with me and are or will be dumped.
Met Art has such a huge library, and such great variety, and Eternal Desire, I really really like Arkisi's work, love most all of his models, some too much :)
Sure there are some sets that didn't hit the mark with me, same at MA, but, overall, Eternal Desire is a winner with me and don't expect that to change.
Especially if there's a new set of Selina coming soon ;)

  • 0

Oh, I prefer the way ED started out, with primarily MA style sets without fingers in the way.

Time changes everything and ED is moving away from what I like. It's too bad. I LOVE the new masturbation videos, but photos of masturbation just don't work for me.

So, we take the bad with the good. I'm just going to be unsatisfied with more of ED's material than I used to be back in the day.

  • 0

@ Arkisi

This kind of set I'd appreciate seeing more often. It's become almost too easy to simply light a model and have her go through "the motions" or "the numbers" as it were and to present Mila this way takes/took a lot of thought and preparation to get it this good. Love the colors, the lighting and the moody feel throughout it.

  • 0

With me, it's a gestalt thing. For the most part, if I like a girl, if she's attractive and has a great personality, then her voice will probably strike me as charming no matter what it sounds like. Her voice is only going to bother me if she's got an awful personality and I can't stand being around her anyway.

  • 0

On a more contemporary note... Li Moon has one of the most well... almost zaftig bodies I've ever had the opportunity of viewing. But of course, at her tender age... well, what else would you expect?

The only down-side I can think of is that she looks like she just might have one of those really high-pitched squeaky voices that I really can't take. You know the kind I mean - the ones that sound like fingernails on a blackboard?

  • 0

Hey, what can I say? Li mush-ifies my brain! She really does!

Li Moon made me do it!

  • 1

@ Arkisi

BTW... nice use of the available outdoor lighting.

  • 1

That is, the girls were naked, not himself.

Never got any complaints - either from the girls, the passersby the campus police or administration.

  • 2

LOL

A clue about how my brane works, Arkie... in the marvelous world of fantasy, the photographer doesn't exist... in a way, the audience does, but not the photographer. In the marvelous world of fantasy, Clarice isn't stripping for a photographer, she's taking her clothes off after a long night on the town and through the magic of fantasy, I get to witness the marvelous results.... (:

  • 1

Oh yer darn tootin' about that, Arkie!

It's just, I can see a pretty girl's fingers any day of the week. I work with plenty of pretty girls and I can see their fingers anytime I'd like. But I don't get to see their ~ strategic zones. So I don't like to see my view of the models' strategic zones blocked by fingers ~ especially with one of my favorite models like Gracie. Who, BTW, has very pretty fingers. (:

I expect tons of interfering fingers at SA, but ED used to be a relatively finger-free zone like MA, so I'm having a difficult time adjusting.

  • 0

The covers "Motela" were made directly from the movie frame because it was shot with extreme quality RAW format. Resolution is little less but the color and light grading are the same as for photo stills as you may see. But I also have some photo sets of Loretta and show them soon.

  • 0

Ha ha! Yeah, you definitely got a rise out of me, didn't you? (;

Actually... ironically... I agree with you about frame 18, but that's because her shirt is hiding the top of the panties so they don't look like granny panties! (:

But for what it's worth, I was 100% sincere that I'm glad you really like the set. (: Arkisi does a great job, and so does Loretta. What a woman!

  • 0

Goodness, Arkie!

If they're Loretta's favorite panties, well, she's quite entitled to like them, I'm not saying she shouldn't.

I'm speaking solely of my personal view of erotica here. I'm not judging Loretta. I'm saying that a young, slim woman like Loretta shouldn't be presented IN EROTICA wearing control top panties, because they are designed to make a heavier woman look slim, and Loretta is already slim. And she shouldn't be presented IN EROTICA wearing granny panties, because granny panties are for old women, not for young sexy women like Loretta.

Sorry to have touched a nerve, brother. If it seems to you that I've gone off the deep end, well, you're quite entitled to that opinion.

For what it's worth, my friend, I'm glad you like the set! (: I'm glad it does for you what Arkisi and Loretta intended. (:

  • 0

@@ FURRY


BTBTW... ① What if Loretta LIKES these? They're her _favorite_ panties. She loves the way they feel. ② If you looked at ONLY frame #18, I'll be willing to bet that you would have something favourable to say about them - the way they "gently cling to her marvelous bottom" or some such.

  • 2

@ FURRY...


BTW... if you ever got past the first page and those "offensive" panties, you might have noticed that there are 5 GREAT portrait shots of Loretta on the second page of the thumbnails (3 of which are really, really outstanding - way to go on those Arkisi - more like that will always be appreciated - at least by me).

I'd even go so fas as to say that, were you there assisting Arkisi and Loretta said that she needed some "help" with her clothing, you'd have bounded right up there like a kitten chasing a ball of catnip-smelling yarn. Maybe she wore them as shock-value just for you! ;-)

  • 1

Hmmmmmmm

How old am I? Well.... I wasn't born yesterday, so I'm a little older than some. On the other hand, I work with seniors so I know I'm a little younger than others. Why would you ask? LOL

As for the alliteration... well, I'm a medical professional, so while the terms "vagina" and "vulva" are perfectly acceptable IMO, they also seem way too clinical to me. And I was in the Navy for 4 years and if you're in the service you learn that a sentence isn't acceptable unless it has at least one vulgarity in it, so by the time I was about 24 I was sick and tired of my potty mouth and so while I don't mind the word "pussy" either, it can get kinda boring after awhile.... so, I sometimes come up with other, more creative ways of saying the same thing that don't sound like I'm writing dialogue for a porn flick. And besides, in my misspent youth, I kind of fancied myself somewhat of a poet... (:

  • 0

Part of the overall picture I guess! (; Plus, the older I get, the more I'm subject to the Magpie effect.... :D

  • 0

I think what struck me was the proportions of her head to the rest of her body, Arkie... (: I could be wrong but I think Sofi's a pretty tiny lady. (: Again, I have zero problem with that! (:

  • 0

I wonder what is it))

  • 1

I mean there's not really much in the field of view by which one can measure Sofi's "tininess" is there?

  • 0

I changed to 29-27-31

Thanks!

  • 0

She lives far away from me and the new shooting will have sense if only K would take some sets more for MA also. Write to her plz :)